An Optical Solution to Overeating?
From Juice Plus+ November 2016 Newsletter
Not a subscriber? Subscribe Here!
Recent research by Professors Brian Wansink and Koert van Ittersum explored how a well established optical illusion leads us to make inaccurate estimates of serving size, depending on what size plate they are presented on. The Delboeuf illusion has long been known to cause us to misjudge the size of identical circles when they are surrounded by larger circles of varying sizes. The more “white space” around the circle, the smaller it appears. We all learned this in school, but it never hurts to be reminded, right?
|
|
Wansink and van Ittersum found that the same applies to the plates and bowls we use every
day. Larger plates can make a serving of food appear smaller, and smaller plates can lead us to
misjudge that very same quantity of food as being significantly larger. For example, in a study
conducted at a health and fitness camp, campers who were given larger bowls served and
consumed 16% more cereal than those given smaller bowls. Despite the fact that those
campers were eating more, their estimates of their cereal consumption were 7% lower than the
estimates of the group eating from the smaller bowls. This suggests that not only could large
dinnerware cause us to serve and eat more; it can do so without us noticing and trick us into
believing we have eaten less.
day. Larger plates can make a serving of food appear smaller, and smaller plates can lead us to
misjudge that very same quantity of food as being significantly larger. For example, in a study
conducted at a health and fitness camp, campers who were given larger bowls served and
consumed 16% more cereal than those given smaller bowls. Despite the fact that those
campers were eating more, their estimates of their cereal consumption were 7% lower than the
estimates of the group eating from the smaller bowls. This suggests that not only could large
dinnerware cause us to serve and eat more; it can do so without us noticing and trick us into
believing we have eaten less.
What can we do to combat this powerful effect? Simply educating consumers to be aware of the
effects of the Delboeuf illusion may not be enough to overcome it. Wansink and van Ittersum
argue that changing our environments by replacing dinnerware is a better solution. We can take
advantage of this visual “trick” by manipulating the dinnerware we use to serve various foods.
Healthy foods such as fresh vegetables should be served in larger plates to encourage
consumption, while less healthy foods should be served from smaller plates to trick our sweet
tooth into feeling satisfied with less.
effects of the Delboeuf illusion may not be enough to overcome it. Wansink and van Ittersum
argue that changing our environments by replacing dinnerware is a better solution. We can take
advantage of this visual “trick” by manipulating the dinnerware we use to serve various foods.
Healthy foods such as fresh vegetables should be served in larger plates to encourage
consumption, while less healthy foods should be served from smaller plates to trick our sweet
tooth into feeling satisfied with less.
In addition to helping us trim our waistlines, this research could also help us make significant
reductions in food waste and costs, especially in all–you–can–eat restaurants, where the use of
smaller plates could significantly cut down on the amount of food customers consume and
waste. This is a win–win situation that saves restaurant owners money and helps restaurant–
goers cut down on serving sizes while still feeling satisfied. It is especially advantageous
because it does not leave the consumer feeling cheated. On the contrary, Wansink and van
Ittersum found that not only does the extra food we serve ourselves from larger dishes go more
or less un–noticed, we do not attribute any extra financial value to it. Results show that
consumers find a 3:4 fill level to be the most aesthetically pleasing and that overfilling beyond
this level does not increase perceptions of value.
reductions in food waste and costs, especially in all–you–can–eat restaurants, where the use of
smaller plates could significantly cut down on the amount of food customers consume and
waste. This is a win–win situation that saves restaurant owners money and helps restaurant–
goers cut down on serving sizes while still feeling satisfied. It is especially advantageous
because it does not leave the consumer feeling cheated. On the contrary, Wansink and van
Ittersum found that not only does the extra food we serve ourselves from larger dishes go more
or less un–noticed, we do not attribute any extra financial value to it. Results show that
consumers find a 3:4 fill level to be the most aesthetically pleasing and that overfilling beyond
this level does not increase perceptions of value.
From: Could an optical illusion be causing us to eat more than we think? by Collen Giblin – http://bit.ly/2egYcUf
“It is easier to change your food environment than to change your mind.”
~ Brian Wansink.